Bhubaneswar, 25/6: The incident involving the alleged sexual abuse of an army officer’s fiancée at Bharatpur Police Station has drawn significant national attention, putting the Odisha Police under intense scrutiny. In response to the ongoing investigation, former Inspector-in-Charge, Dinakrushna Mishra, has taken a bold and transparent step by consenting to undergo polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain mapping tests at a forensic laboratory in Gujarat. This move is pivotal, highlighting his commitment to revealing the truth and upholding the integrity of the police force amid swirling accusations and media speculation.
The controversy began when the fiancée of an army officer accused Inspector Dinakrushna Mishra and other police personnel of misconduct and abuse while in custody at Bharatpur Police Station. The allegations quickly gained traction, fueled by emotional public statements made by the woman from a wheelchair at AIIMS, where she presented herself as a victim of severe assault and mistreatment. These claims sparked widespread public outrage, with many questioning the actions and ethics of the police force. The incident led to a barrage of criticism against the Commissionerate Police, with accusations of abuse of power and failure to protect the rights of citizens.
Despite the uproar, several discrepancies in the victim’s narrative began to emerge. Video evidence surfaced showing the couple at BBI (Buzze Buzz In-house) in Chandrasekharpur, where they appeared consuming alcohol a dancing to the music,later banging the lift and fighting some youth on the road whom she showed middle finger using objectionable words , contradicting their claims of victimhood. The footage revealed the so-called captain carrying the woman’s vanity bag, with neither of them appearing distressed or injured. Moreover, the video captured inside the police station showed the captain writing something, surrounded by officers, indicating that the couple was given the opportunity to lodge a formal complaint—contrary to their assertions of being denied justice.
Further inconsistencies were noted when the woman refused to submit a written report detailing the incident, raising questions about the authenticity of her claims. Additionally, medical reports from AIIMS and other agencies confirmed that the woman did not sustain serious injuries, contradicting her dramatic appearance before the media with a neck brace and plaster cast. These contradictions have fueled suspicions that the allegations were exaggerated or fabricated to malign the police force.
In light of these unfolding events, Inspector Dinakrushna Mishra’s decision to voluntarily undergo polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain mapping tests is a significant demonstration of his resolve to clear his name and that of the Odisha Police. By consenting to these rigorous and intrusive examinations, Mishra is putting himself under scientific scrutiny, knowing full well that these tests will explore his subconscious, revealing any deceit or dishonesty. Such a move is not only rare but also highlights his confidence in his innocence and his desire for the truth to prevail.
The consent given by Mishra to undergo these tests at a forensic laboratory in Gujarat further cements his stand against the false narratives being propagated against him and the police. It sends a clear message that he is willing to face any challenge to prove his integrity, setting an example of accountability and transparency that should resonate across the police forces.
Mishra’s proactive approach serves as a direct counter to those attempting to manipulate public perception and cast the Odisha Police in a negative light. The ongoing media trial has been rife with sensationalism, often overshadowing the facts with biased reporting and emotional appeals. Mishra’s consent to these tests will provide an unbiased, scientific perspective that cannot be easily disputed, challenging the narrative being spun by those who seek to discredit the police force.
This act of transparency is expected to silence influencers and critics who have been leveraging the incident to attack the police fraternity. It highlights the need for caution against blindly accepting narratives that lack substantiation, particularly when such narratives are designed to provoke public outrage and erode trust in Odisha Police .
As the investigation progresses, it is crucial for both the public and media to remain objective, awaiting the results of the tests that Mishra has willingly agreed to undergo. The Odisha Police must continue to uphold the highest standards of discipline and professionalism, ensuring that justice is served based on facts, not hearsay.
Inspector Dinakrushna Mishra’s willingness to subject himself to polygraph, narco-analysis, and brain mapping tests serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of truth and accountability. It is a call to evaluate all evidence impartially and resist the temptation to succumb to media sensationalism. As responsible citizens and members of a disciplined department, we must advocate for justice based on objective evidence, supporting those who strive to uphold the law with honesty and integrity.